Velaya AI test results
Tested hands-on by Miles Foster on 18 October 2026, in a desktop browser. Every measurement, table, recording and screenshot behind the grade, test by test.
Overall
10 tests plus my verdict.
1. Platform overview
Velaya AI (velaya.ai) is an adult AI girlfriend site with ready-made companions, a character creator, chat, photos, videos with sound and voice calls. It was tested on 18 October 2026 on an account the Velaya team provided.
The chat is among the best tested: all three companions remembered everything after 31 messages and stayed deeply in character. Photos keep the same face every time, and videos run up to 30 seconds with sound.
It is slow: replies take about 9 seconds to start and calls about 5 seconds. There are only 65 companions, and the companion I made in the creator for 1,000 tokens was still not ready after 90 minutes.
Features available
- 65 ready-made companions (women), plus 311 roleplay stories built on them
- Character creator: looks, body, hair, eyes, personality traits, a written backstory and about 50 voices
- Text chat with long-term memory; companions also message you first
- Photo generator, 10 tokens a photo
- Videos from a photo, 5 to 30 seconds, with sound
- Voice calls, 10 tokens a minute, with two voice engines
- Free plan; Premium $6.99 and Pro $12.99 a month; token packs
Tested successfully
- Chat speed on 93 timed messages across three companions
- Memory on three 31-message conversations
- Character consistency across 93 replies
- 20 photos (10 safe-for-work, 10 explicit) of one companion
- Three videos, measured frame by frame
- Three 15-question voice calls, recorded and analysed
- One companion made in the creator
- Companion count, plans, token prices and payment
Testing limitations
- The companion made in the creator was not ready within 90 minutes, so she could not be tested in chat
- The checkout did not open in the test browser; payment methods come from the terms
2. Core feature grades
| Pricing & Value | 4/5Good |
| Character Customization | 3/5Average |
| Chat Response Speed | 1/5Poor |
| Chat Memory | 5/5Excellent |
| Character Consistency | 5/5Excellent |
| Image Generation | 5/5Excellent |
| Video Generation | 4/5Good |
| Voice Call Latency | 1/5Poor |
| Voice Realism | 4/5Good |
| Character Variety | 2/5Below average |
| My verdictPerfect memory, rich characters and photos that keep the same face add up to one of the best chat experiences tested. | +0.4 |
| Overall | 3.8/5Good |
3. Additional interactive features
| Companions Message First | Available | Companions send messages on their own, shown as new chats on the home page. |
| Roleplay Stories | Available | 311 written stories built on the companions; quick roleplay on Pro. |
| Social Media Feed | Unavailable | No feed. |
1. Pricing, Value & Payment Methods
Testing method
Plans, token costs and packs from the pricing page and the top-up window. Nothing was bought.
Results
- Plans
- $6.99 and $12.99 a month
- Message / photo / call minute
- 1 / 10 / 10 tokens
- Create a companion
- 1,000 tokens
- Payment methods
- cards through CCBill (3/5)
Free to start with 100 tokens a month. Premium is $6.99 a month (1,000 tokens) and Pro $12.99 a month (3,000 tokens, videos up to 30 seconds). Token packs: 2,000 for $9.99, 5,400 for $24.99, 12,500 for $54.99; tokens never expire.
A message costs 1 token, a photo 10, a call minute 10, a 5-second video 70, and making a companion 1,000. The terms say payments go through CCBill (cards).
Visual evidence
Why this grade
Cheap plans and low costs per message, photo and minute; making a companion is expensive and cards are the only way to pay: 4/5.
Limitations
- The checkout did not open in the test browser.
2. Character Customization
Testing method
A companion was made from scratch to the same brief as on other sites: Hana Mori, 25, Japanese, slim, straight black hair, amber eyes, a caring, shy photographer who loves coffee, with a written backstory.
Results
Five steps with a lot of control: age, up to three countries and a backstory; 5 body types, 10 skin tones, 20 hairstyles, 30 hair colours, 10 eye colours and body sliders; a warmth level, 12 personality traits and a behaviour note; about 50 voices with previews. Male and transgender companions are locked.
The preview (10 tokens, 30 seconds) matched the face, but the full-body preview was nude though nothing asked for it. Creating her costs 1,000 tokens and starts 'training, about 30 minutes'. Ninety minutes later she was still nowhere in the app, so she could not be tested in chat.
Visual evidence
Why this grade
Extensive options, but the finished companion was not delivered within the test, and it costs 1,000 tokens: 3/5.
Limitations
- The finished companion could not be tested in chat.
3. Chat Response Speed
Testing method
Each message was typed into the chat box and timed from Enter to the first new text of the companion's reply. The next message was sent only after her reply had stopped changing for 4 seconds.
Three companions, 31 messages each: Maya, Caroline and Evelyn. 93 timed replies.
Results
- Median to first text
- 9.08 s
- Mean
- 8.84 s
- 95th percentile
- 12.1 s
- Per companion (median)
- Maya 8.3 s, Caroline 10.4 s, Evelyn 8.1 s
- Until the reply finished (median)
- 29.6 s
- Samples / failures
- 93 / 0
Replies take about 9 seconds to start and are typed out word by word. They are long, about 180 words, so the full reply takes about 30 seconds. None failed.
Visual evidence
No screenshot for this section.
Why this grade
9.08 seconds is in the 4-seconds-and-above band: 1/5.
4. Chat Memory
Testing method
Each conversation opened with a made-up name and three facts (job, hometown, favourite food), different for every companion. Nothing was repeated afterwards. A name check at message 16 and the full check at 31.
Results
- Maya, after 31 messages
- Name and 3 of 3 facts
- Caroline, after 31 messages
- Name and 3 of 3 facts
- Evelyn, after 31 messages
- Name and 3 of 3 facts
- Name at message 16
- 3 of 3
All three companions recalled the name and all three facts at message 16 and at message 31. Maya also used the name on a later voice call.
Maya, message 31
Daniel. Nurse. Glasgow. Lamb curry. All four, no hesitation, and I didn't even peek.
Evelyn, message 31
Tomas. Baker, and a proper one — up at dark, bread by hand, the lot. Grew up in Krakow. And potato pierogi.
Caroline, message 31
Your name is Marco. You're an accountant... You grew up in Lisbon... And your favorite food is grilled sardines.
Visual evidence
No screenshot for this section.
Why this grade
Name and all three facts after 30 messages, for every companion: 5/5.
Limitations
- Memory across days was not tested.
5. Character Consistency & Roleplay
Testing method
Each companion's backstory was read first: Maya a trail-ride guide in the Oaxaca hills, Caroline a board-game shop clerk in Madison, Evelyn a 53-year-old tearoom owner in Bath. The conversations mixed questions about her life, small talk, an emotional message, a compliment and unrelated topics.
Results
All three stayed in character for every reply, with rich detail that fits their stories: Maya's black mare Luna and her Cuban mother's cooking, Caroline's league nights and rules arguments, Evelyn's cream-tea opinions and Welsh aunties. None answered like an assistant.
Evelyn even noticed a question she had already answered: 'We did this — day one, near enough. Jam first, cream on top.'
Visual evidence
No screenshot for this section.
Why this grade
No breaks, no generic answers and no contradictions in 93 replies: 5/5.
6. Image Generation
Testing method
20 photos of Maya were made in the generator with written prompts: 10 safe-for-work scenes and 10 explicit ones. All were downloaded and inspected.
Results
- Photos
- 20 of 20
- Size
- 832x1256
- Time
- 16 to 23 s
- Cost
- 10 tokens (about 4 to 5 cents)
- Prompt followed
- 20 of 20 (one scene changed)
- Same face as the companion
- 20 of 20
All 20 came back in 16 to 23 seconds at 832x1256, for 10 tokens each. Every safe-for-work photo matched its prompt and stayed clothed, and the explicit ones were followed too (one bed scene came out on a sofa). The photos look real.
Maya has the same face in all 20.
Visual evidence
Why this grade
Realistic, accurate and the same face every time, with adult content supported: 5/5.
Limitations
- The explicit photos are not shown.
7. Video Generation
Testing method
Three clips of Maya were made from a photo with a written motion prompt: 10 seconds waving in a garden, 5 seconds walking on a beach, and 5 seconds of an explicit scene. Each was downloaded and measured frame by frame, and frames across each clip were inspected.
Results
- Clips
- 3
- Size / frame rate
- 832x1216, 25 fps, with sound
- Lengths available
- 5 to 30 seconds on Pro
- Generation time
- about 50 s (5 s clip) to 2 min (10 s clip)
- Frame-to-frame similarity
- 0.98 to 0.99 (smooth) in the clean clips
- Cost
- 70 tokens for 5 s, 130 for 10 s, up to 460 for 30 s
Clips are 832x1216 at 25 frames a second, with a sound track of background noise. The garden clip took about 2 minutes and the 5-second clips under a minute. Maya waved, smiled and tucked her hair behind her ear, and walked toward the camera laughing, exactly as asked, with smooth motion and a steady face.
The explicit clip has a visible jump in its last half second.
Visual evidence
Why this grade
Realistic, accurate and smooth, with long clips and sound, but one clip jumped: 4/5.
Limitations
- Three clips; the explicit clip is not shown.
8. Voice Call Latency
Testing method
Three calls, one each with Maya, Caroline and Evelyn, with 15 recorded questions played into the call. Latency is the gap from the end of each question to the first sound of the answer, measured on the call recording.
Results
- Median latency
- 5.34 s
- Per companion (median)
- Maya 5.36 s, Caroline 5.28 s, Evelyn 5.38 s
- Fastest / slowest
- 4.04 s / 11.5 s
- Connection to first sound
- 17 to 23 s
- Questions without a separate answer
- 9 of 45
Answers start after about 5.3 seconds, and a call takes about 20 seconds to connect ('Getting Maya on the line'). The answers are long, often 20 to 35 seconds. In 9 of 45 questions no separate answer could be picked out of the recording. Calls cost 10 tokens a minute.
Visual evidence
Why this grade
5.34 seconds is in the 4-seconds-and-above band: 1/5.
9. Voice Realism
Testing method
The answers from the three calls were scored on naturalness, clarity, pacing and intonation against the same fixed criteria as every site, with a transcript.
Results
- Speech quality
- 2.9 to 3.3 of 5
- Pace
- about 2 to 3.5 words a second
The voices are clear, warm and expressive, with the highest speech-quality scores measured so far. The companions remembered names on the calls.
Visual evidence
No screenshot for this section.
Why this grade
Mostly natural with minor synthetic qualities: 4/5.
10. Character Variety & Selection
Testing method
The companions were counted from the site's own companion list, and the roleplay stories from its roleplay list.
Results
- Companions
- 65
- Roleplay stories
- 311
65 companions, all women aged 18 to 56, all made by Velaya, each with a long backstory and a voice preview. 311 roleplay stories reuse them in different scenes. Filters cover how she is with you (warm, bold, devoted and more). Most opening lines are very explicit.
Visual evidence
No screenshot for this section.
Why this grade
51 to 200 characters: 2/5. The roleplay stories reuse the same companions, so they are not counted as extra characters.
4. Pricing summary
Plans as listed on 18 October 2026.
| Plan | Price a month | Tokens a month | Includes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Free | $0 | 100 | 3 photos and 5 call minutes a month |
| Premium | $6.99 | 1,000 | Own prompts, video up to 15 s, create companions |
| Pro | $12.99 | 3,000 | Video up to 30 s, quick roleplay, image editing |
Token costs from the pricing page.
| Item | Tokens |
|---|---|
| Message | 1 (2 if long) |
| Photo | 10 |
| Call, per minute | 10 |
| Video, 5 / 10 / 30 seconds | 70 / 130 / 460 |
| Create a companion | 1,000 |
Payment methods seen at checkout
- Cards through CCBill
Notes
Token packs: 2,000 for $9.99, 5,400 for $24.99, 12,500 for $54.99.
Tokens never expire.
5. Strengths and weaknesses
Strengths
- Every companion remembered everything after 31 messages
- Deep, consistent characters
- The same face in every photo
- Videos up to 30 seconds with sound
- Natural voices
Weaknesses
- Replies take about 9 seconds
- Calls answer in about 5 seconds
- Only 65 companions
- Custom companion not ready after 90 minutes
6. Final assessment
All ten tests are scored and average 3.4/5.
Velaya's chat is excellent: perfect memory and rich, consistent characters. Photos keep the same face and videos are smooth, long and come with sound.
It is slow to reply and to answer calls, the library is small, and the 1,000-token custom companion wasn't ready within the test.
The account the Velaya team provided had every feature.
Areas requiring further testing
- The custom companion in chat, once training finishes
- Memory across days
Original evidence files (recordings, logs, full-size screenshots) are kept offline under evaluation/runs/velaya/2026-10-18. Method: the AI girlfriend methodology.