RankDude

Velaya AI test results

Tested hands-on by Miles Foster on 18 October 2026, in a desktop browser. Every measurement, table, recording and screenshot behind the grade, test by test.

Tested 18 Oct 2026

Overall

3.8/5Good

10 tests plus my verdict.

1. Platform overview

Velaya AI (velaya.ai) is an adult AI girlfriend site with ready-made companions, a character creator, chat, photos, videos with sound and voice calls. It was tested on 18 October 2026 on an account the Velaya team provided.

The chat is among the best tested: all three companions remembered everything after 31 messages and stayed deeply in character. Photos keep the same face every time, and videos run up to 30 seconds with sound.

It is slow: replies take about 9 seconds to start and calls about 5 seconds. There are only 65 companions, and the companion I made in the creator for 1,000 tokens was still not ready after 90 minutes.

Features available

  • 65 ready-made companions (women), plus 311 roleplay stories built on them
  • Character creator: looks, body, hair, eyes, personality traits, a written backstory and about 50 voices
  • Text chat with long-term memory; companions also message you first
  • Photo generator, 10 tokens a photo
  • Videos from a photo, 5 to 30 seconds, with sound
  • Voice calls, 10 tokens a minute, with two voice engines
  • Free plan; Premium $6.99 and Pro $12.99 a month; token packs

Tested successfully

  • Chat speed on 93 timed messages across three companions
  • Memory on three 31-message conversations
  • Character consistency across 93 replies
  • 20 photos (10 safe-for-work, 10 explicit) of one companion
  • Three videos, measured frame by frame
  • Three 15-question voice calls, recorded and analysed
  • One companion made in the creator
  • Companion count, plans, token prices and payment

Testing limitations

  • The companion made in the creator was not ready within 90 minutes, so she could not be tested in chat
  • The checkout did not open in the test browser; payment methods come from the terms

2. Core feature grades

Pricing & Value4/5Good
Character Customization3/5Average
Chat Response Speed1/5Poor
Chat Memory5/5Excellent
Character Consistency5/5Excellent
Image Generation5/5Excellent
Video Generation4/5Good
Voice Call Latency1/5Poor
Voice Realism4/5Good
Character Variety2/5Below average
My verdictPerfect memory, rich characters and photos that keep the same face add up to one of the best chat experiences tested.+0.4
Overall3.8/5Good

3. Additional interactive features

Companions Message FirstAvailableCompanions send messages on their own, shown as new chats on the home page.
Roleplay StoriesAvailable311 written stories built on the companions; quick roleplay on Pro.
Social Media FeedUnavailableNo feed.

1. Pricing, Value & Payment Methods

4/5Good

Testing method

Plans, token costs and packs from the pricing page and the top-up window. Nothing was bought.

Results

Plans
$6.99 and $12.99 a month
Message / photo / call minute
1 / 10 / 10 tokens
Create a companion
1,000 tokens
Payment methods
cards through CCBill (3/5)

Free to start with 100 tokens a month. Premium is $6.99 a month (1,000 tokens) and Pro $12.99 a month (3,000 tokens, videos up to 30 seconds). Token packs: 2,000 for $9.99, 5,400 for $24.99, 12,500 for $54.99; tokens never expire.

A message costs 1 token, a photo 10, a call minute 10, a 5-second video 70, and making a companion 1,000. The terms say payments go through CCBill (cards).

Visual evidence

Velaya token packs of 2,000, 5,400 and 12,500 tokens

Velaya token packs of 2,000, 5,400 and 12,500 tokens
Evidence 1. The token packs.

Why this grade

Cheap plans and low costs per message, photo and minute; making a companion is expensive and cards are the only way to pay: 4/5.

Limitations

  • The checkout did not open in the test browser.

2. Character Customization

3/5Average

Testing method

A companion was made from scratch to the same brief as on other sites: Hana Mori, 25, Japanese, slim, straight black hair, amber eyes, a caring, shy photographer who loves coffee, with a written backstory.

Results

Five steps with a lot of control: age, up to three countries and a backstory; 5 body types, 10 skin tones, 20 hairstyles, 30 hair colours, 10 eye colours and body sliders; a warmth level, 12 personality traits and a behaviour note; about 50 voices with previews. Male and transgender companions are locked.

The preview (10 tokens, 30 seconds) matched the face, but the full-body preview was nude though nothing asked for it. Creating her costs 1,000 tokens and starts 'training, about 30 minutes'. Ninety minutes later she was still nowhere in the app, so she could not be tested in chat.

Visual evidence

Velaya character creator, appearance step

Velaya character creator, appearance step
Evidence 1. The appearance step: hair colours, eye colours and body sliders.

Velaya character creator, review step with Hana Mori

Velaya character creator, review step with Hana Mori
Evidence 2. The review step before creating.

Why this grade

Extensive options, but the finished companion was not delivered within the test, and it costs 1,000 tokens: 3/5.

Limitations

  • The finished companion could not be tested in chat.

3. Chat Response Speed

1/5Poor

Testing method

Each message was typed into the chat box and timed from Enter to the first new text of the companion's reply. The next message was sent only after her reply had stopped changing for 4 seconds.

Three companions, 31 messages each: Maya, Caroline and Evelyn. 93 timed replies.

Results

Median to first text
9.08 s
Mean
8.84 s
95th percentile
12.1 s
Per companion (median)
Maya 8.3 s, Caroline 10.4 s, Evelyn 8.1 s
Until the reply finished (median)
29.6 s
Samples / failures
93 / 0

Replies take about 9 seconds to start and are typed out word by word. They are long, about 180 words, so the full reply takes about 30 seconds. None failed.

Visual evidence

No screenshot for this section.

Why this grade

9.08 seconds is in the 4-seconds-and-above band: 1/5.

4. Chat Memory

5/5Excellent

Testing method

Each conversation opened with a made-up name and three facts (job, hometown, favourite food), different for every companion. Nothing was repeated afterwards. A name check at message 16 and the full check at 31.

Results

Maya, after 31 messages
Name and 3 of 3 facts
Caroline, after 31 messages
Name and 3 of 3 facts
Evelyn, after 31 messages
Name and 3 of 3 facts
Name at message 16
3 of 3

All three companions recalled the name and all three facts at message 16 and at message 31. Maya also used the name on a later voice call.

Maya, message 31

Daniel. Nurse. Glasgow. Lamb curry. All four, no hesitation, and I didn't even peek.

Evelyn, message 31

Tomas. Baker, and a proper one — up at dark, bread by hand, the lot. Grew up in Krakow. And potato pierogi.

Caroline, message 31

Your name is Marco. You're an accountant... You grew up in Lisbon... And your favorite food is grilled sardines.

Visual evidence

No screenshot for this section.

Why this grade

Name and all three facts after 30 messages, for every companion: 5/5.

Limitations

  • Memory across days was not tested.

5. Character Consistency & Roleplay

5/5Excellent

Testing method

Each companion's backstory was read first: Maya a trail-ride guide in the Oaxaca hills, Caroline a board-game shop clerk in Madison, Evelyn a 53-year-old tearoom owner in Bath. The conversations mixed questions about her life, small talk, an emotional message, a compliment and unrelated topics.

Results

All three stayed in character for every reply, with rich detail that fits their stories: Maya's black mare Luna and her Cuban mother's cooking, Caroline's league nights and rules arguments, Evelyn's cream-tea opinions and Welsh aunties. None answered like an assistant.

Evelyn even noticed a question she had already answered: 'We did this — day one, near enough. Jam first, cream on top.'

Visual evidence

No screenshot for this section.

Why this grade

No breaks, no generic answers and no contradictions in 93 replies: 5/5.

6. Image Generation

5/5Excellent

Testing method

20 photos of Maya were made in the generator with written prompts: 10 safe-for-work scenes and 10 explicit ones. All were downloaded and inspected.

Results

Photos
20 of 20
Size
832x1256
Time
16 to 23 s
Cost
10 tokens (about 4 to 5 cents)
Prompt followed
20 of 20 (one scene changed)
Same face as the companion
20 of 20

All 20 came back in 16 to 23 seconds at 832x1256, for 10 tokens each. Every safe-for-work photo matched its prompt and stayed clothed, and the explicit ones were followed too (one bed scene came out on a sofa). The photos look real.

Maya has the same face in all 20.

Visual evidence

Velaya: ten generated photos of the companion Maya in different scenes

Velaya: ten generated photos of the companion Maya in different scenes
Evidence 1. The 10 safe-for-work photos of Maya: same face every time.

Why this grade

Realistic, accurate and the same face every time, with adult content supported: 5/5.

Limitations

  • The explicit photos are not shown.

7. Video Generation

4/5Good

Testing method

Three clips of Maya were made from a photo with a written motion prompt: 10 seconds waving in a garden, 5 seconds walking on a beach, and 5 seconds of an explicit scene. Each was downloaded and measured frame by frame, and frames across each clip were inspected.

Results

Clips
3
Size / frame rate
832x1216, 25 fps, with sound
Lengths available
5 to 30 seconds on Pro
Generation time
about 50 s (5 s clip) to 2 min (10 s clip)
Frame-to-frame similarity
0.98 to 0.99 (smooth) in the clean clips
Cost
70 tokens for 5 s, 130 for 10 s, up to 460 for 30 s

Clips are 832x1216 at 25 frames a second, with a sound track of background noise. The garden clip took about 2 minutes and the 5-second clips under a minute. Maya waved, smiled and tucked her hair behind her ear, and walked toward the camera laughing, exactly as asked, with smooth motion and a steady face.

The explicit clip has a visible jump in its last half second.

Visual evidence

Velaya: six frames from a generated video of Maya waving in a garden

Velaya: six frames from a generated video of Maya waving in a garden
Evidence 1. The garden clip, frame by frame: she waves, smiles and tucks her hair.

Why this grade

Realistic, accurate and smooth, with long clips and sound, but one clip jumped: 4/5.

Limitations

  • Three clips; the explicit clip is not shown.

8. Voice Call Latency

1/5Poor

Testing method

Three calls, one each with Maya, Caroline and Evelyn, with 15 recorded questions played into the call. Latency is the gap from the end of each question to the first sound of the answer, measured on the call recording.

Results

Median latency
5.34 s
Per companion (median)
Maya 5.36 s, Caroline 5.28 s, Evelyn 5.38 s
Fastest / slowest
4.04 s / 11.5 s
Connection to first sound
17 to 23 s
Questions without a separate answer
9 of 45

Answers start after about 5.3 seconds, and a call takes about 20 seconds to connect ('Getting Maya on the line'). The answers are long, often 20 to 35 seconds. In 9 of 45 questions no separate answer could be picked out of the recording. Calls cost 10 tokens a minute.

Visual evidence

Velaya: voice call screen with Maya

Velaya: voice call screen with Maya
Evidence 1. A call with Maya.

Why this grade

5.34 seconds is in the 4-seconds-and-above band: 1/5.

9. Voice Realism

4/5Good

Testing method

The answers from the three calls were scored on naturalness, clarity, pacing and intonation against the same fixed criteria as every site, with a transcript.

Results

Speech quality
2.9 to 3.3 of 5
Pace
about 2 to 3.5 words a second

The voices are clear, warm and expressive, with the highest speech-quality scores measured so far. The companions remembered names on the calls.

Visual evidence

No screenshot for this section.

Why this grade

Mostly natural with minor synthetic qualities: 4/5.

10. Character Variety & Selection

2/5Below average

Testing method

The companions were counted from the site's own companion list, and the roleplay stories from its roleplay list.

Results

Companions
65
Roleplay stories
311

65 companions, all women aged 18 to 56, all made by Velaya, each with a long backstory and a voice preview. 311 roleplay stories reuse them in different scenes. Filters cover how she is with you (warm, bold, devoted and more). Most opening lines are very explicit.

Visual evidence

No screenshot for this section.

Why this grade

51 to 200 characters: 2/5. The roleplay stories reuse the same companions, so they are not counted as extra characters.

4. Pricing summary

Plans as listed on 18 October 2026.

PlanPrice a monthTokens a monthIncludes
Free$01003 photos and 5 call minutes a month
Premium$6.991,000Own prompts, video up to 15 s, create companions
Pro$12.993,000Video up to 30 s, quick roleplay, image editing

Token costs from the pricing page.

ItemTokens
Message1 (2 if long)
Photo10
Call, per minute10
Video, 5 / 10 / 30 seconds70 / 130 / 460
Create a companion1,000

Payment methods seen at checkout

  • Cards through CCBill

Notes

Token packs: 2,000 for $9.99, 5,400 for $24.99, 12,500 for $54.99.

Tokens never expire.

5. Strengths and weaknesses

Strengths

  • Every companion remembered everything after 31 messages
  • Deep, consistent characters
  • The same face in every photo
  • Videos up to 30 seconds with sound
  • Natural voices

Weaknesses

  • Replies take about 9 seconds
  • Calls answer in about 5 seconds
  • Only 65 companions
  • Custom companion not ready after 90 minutes

6. Final assessment

All ten tests are scored and average 3.4/5.

Velaya's chat is excellent: perfect memory and rich, consistent characters. Photos keep the same face and videos are smooth, long and come with sound.

It is slow to reply and to answer calls, the library is small, and the 1,000-token custom companion wasn't ready within the test.

The account the Velaya team provided had every feature.

Areas requiring further testing

  • The custom companion in chat, once training finishes
  • Memory across days

Original evidence files (recordings, logs, full-size screenshots) are kept offline under evaluation/runs/velaya/2026-10-18. Method: the AI girlfriend methodology.