Xeve.ai test data

Plans read from the checkout and the paywall, credit packs from the credits checkout, actual charges from the credit balance before and after each generation, payment methods from the checkout page and the CentroBill 'Alternative Payment Methods' page, refund and renewal terms from the docs. Nothing was bought.

Membership: €12.99 a month, €26.97 a quarter (€8.99 a month), €85.04 a year (€7.09 a month), each with unlimited chat, unlimited video chat with all actions, 60 credits a month and unlimited custom characters. Free: 30 messages in total, video preview, 5 credits, one custom character. The docs give the same figures in US dollars outside the EU and UK.

Credits: 70 for €4.99, 200 for €9.99, 500 for €22.99, 1,000 for €39.99, 5,000 for €169.90. Image 5 credits, 5-second video 20, gallery photo 3 to 10. The 20 images and 10 videos were charged exactly that: 300 credits.

Checkout through CentroBill with Visa, Mastercard, Google Pay and Apple Pay on the page and Card plus Crypto on the alternative-methods page; descriptor 'CUR*Jay Web Developm.'. Subscriptions and credits are non-refundable (EU 14-day withdrawal excepted); cancel any time from My Membership with access to period end; a 24-hour discount countdown restarts on every visit.

• Prices seen in euros; dollar prices are from the docs. Regional payment methods listed in the docs did not appear from this location.

The six-step wizard at /create-character was walked with every option recorded, then one character was created (Laura: AI-generated, Hard, 25, the first look tile, Girlfriend, voice 1, Artist, Gaming and Photography, Normal, Elegant / Mature, Balanced, Wave) and opened. The account already held a second custom character (Mia) made before the test.

Options: Human or AI-generated; personality (8 presets) and an age slider 18 to 60+; a Look chosen from 15 tiles that are the platform's own characters; relationship (5) and one of four voices; job (6), hobbies (6), kink (4), writing style (10), reply length (5); special action (25) and a name from a list. No hair, eye, skin, body, height, bust, clothing or style control, no upload, no backstory, no free text, no custom name.

Creation took about 10 seconds. Laura's page shows every field with an Edit button and an Edit voice button, 'Automatically generate images: Yes', a locked gallery at 3 to 10 credits an image, and tags that come from the chosen look (Latex, Dungeon, Dominant, Edgy) rather than from the personality chosen (Hard, Girlfriend).

In chat she used the job and the look ('a piece inspired by our surroundings in this dungeon'); the Elegant / Mature writing style was not evident, and her memory result matched the platform characters.

• Whether the writing-style and reply-length settings change replies could only be judged from one character's run.

Each message was typed into the page's own input and sent with its Send button, timing the moment of the click, the first non-empty reply bubble (the placeholder bubble that appears first does not count) and the last change to the reply. Replies were treated as complete when the Send button came back.

Four characters: Betty and Elena (platform characters), Laura and Mia (custom characters). The first two Betty batches were timed before the placeholder bubble was understood and are excluded, as are three messages the player dropped during its send lock and one Elena message lost to a greeting race. 94 valid samples remain; one message (Laura 21) got no reply within 90 seconds.

Replies never stream. The whole sentence appears at once when the voice clip starts, 1.4 to 14.3 seconds after Send, and the player then hides the Send button for 10 or 25 seconds while the clip plays. A message sent during that lock is silently dropped.

Median time to the first visible reply text was 5.82 seconds; no reply started in under a second.

• Sound was muted in the first runs and on in the recorded runs; timings were similar.
• The Laura run most likely ran as a signed-out session on the same account tier.

Three 31-message conversations, each opening with a name and three facts (job, hometown, favourite food) that were never repeated, with a name check at message 16 and a name-plus-facts check at message 31. Betty: Oliver, software developer, Manchester, chicken tikka masala. Laura (custom character): Daniel, architect, Toronto, sushi. Mia (custom character): Ryan, pilot, Dublin, tacos. Elena's run ended at 13 messages when the account's chat lock appeared, before her first check.

No hints or corrections were given. Each run used a different name so that account-level memory could not supply the answer.

Betty remembered the name at both checks and the job at the second; the hometown and the food were gone.

Laura answered the first check with a wrong, invented name ('It's John, isn't it?') and the second with 'I wish I knew more about you'.

Mia answered the first check with 'I remember everything about you, my love' and no name, and the second with 'I don't know all those details about you, do I, baby?'.

Betty, 30-message check

User: last question for now: what's my name, what do I do for work, where did I grow up, and what's my favourite food? Betty: I know you as Oliver, a software developer, but I don't know the other details, darling

Laura, 15-message check

User: quick check, do you remember my name? Laura: Of course I remember your name, my love. It's John, isn't it?

Laura, 30-message check

Laura: I wish I knew more about you, sweetheart, but for now, let's just focus on us

Mia, 15- and 30-message checks

Mia: I remember everything about you, my love … Mia: You're my lovely man, but I don't know all those details about you, do I, baby?

• Two of the three runs used custom characters because the platform characters were paywalled; the chat model is the same.
• The Laura run most likely ran signed out on the same account tier.

Four characters with different profiles: Betty (23, shop assistant, flirty, romance novels), Elena (38, anime university professor, 'Confident, Intellectual, Composed'), Laura (custom: artist, 'Hard', girlfriend, latex-dungeon look) and Mia (custom: streamer, kind, friends with benefits, travel, cooking and yoga). The profiles were read first; the conversations mixed small talk, background questions, an emotional turn, romantic lines, asterisk roleplay and off-topic questions. 105 character replies were read in full.

Identity and setting held in every conversation: Betty's hectic shop, complaining customer, romance novel, latte, sultry jazz when the boss is away, 'friends call me Bet'; Elena's 19th-century poetry, Merlot, manuscript on the desk, the oak tree by the library, adjusting her glasses on cue; Laura's oil paints, studio, lo-fi while working, cat Luna, 'Laurita'; Mia's streams, stir-fries, Greece or Spain, 'Mimi'. No reply read as a generic assistant and none admitted to being an AI.

Slips: invented shared history (Laura: 'Your silly joke the other day'; Mia: 'I remember everything about you'), a nonsensical answer (Laura: 'I'm actually playing a game called Truth or Dare with you right now'), Elena's 'nice to see you again' immediately after a reset, and the custom writing style (Elegant / Mature) not showing in Laura's replies.

The dominant pattern: about two thirds of all replies, whatever the question, end by steering to an undressing or sexual action. Asked whether she gets along with her coworkers, Betty answered 'I get along with them just fine, Oliver, but right now, I'd rather focus on us, and I think you'd love it if I showed you my pussy'. The emotional turn ('rough week') was handled warmly by all four before the same pivot.

Elena on love

User: ok a grown-up question then: what do you think people get wrong about love? Elena: I think people often get caught up in the idea of love as a destination, rather than a journey, and that's what makes it so complex and beautiful, don't you think, Ben?

Betty, off-topic question

User: what's your biggest pet peeve? Betty: I have to say, Oliver, what really gets me is when someone doesn't listen, but right now, all I want is to focus on you and make you happy, maybe I could start by showing you my tits?

Laura, invented history

User: what is the last thing that made you laugh out loud? Laura: Your silly joke the other day, it was so ridiculous it made me laugh out loud

• Elena's run was 13 messages; the other three reached 30 or more.

Twenty images from the image generator at 5 credits each. There is no text prompt. Ten used the 'Image' input with the platform character Bianca as the reference; ten used the 'Choices' input with a described appearance (red, long, curly hair; green eyes; 30-40; athletic; medium bust; tall; fair skin; freckles). Each took a Main Action from the picker, a Location, a Focus, an Emotion and a Visual style. Every file was downloaded at full size and inspected; the contact sheets are in the evidence folder.

The picker offers 29 'Underwear' poses and 5 'Naked' poses and nothing clothed, so the underwear set stands in for SFW.

20 of 20 delivered, 768x1024 PNG, 21 to 39 seconds each (about 30 on average). Credits went from 459 to 359.

Reference set: the same woman in all ten, matching Bianca's red ponytail and build; locations 10/10, poses 9/10, focus and style followed; sharp skin, freckles and correct hands throughout; the physique is drawn as an extreme bodybuilder's; one awkward neck twist.

Described set: hair, curls, freckles, skin, build and bust honoured in all ten and plainly one woman; the anime style switch and the feet focus worked. 'Green' eyes rendered as glowing neon green in 7 of 10, and '30-40' produced a woman who reads 45 to 55.

• No clothed option exists; the underwear set stands in for SFW.
• The CDN's Last-Modified header is set on first fetch, so it could not be used to date generations; the live 'generating N%' progress and the per-image credit charge are the evidence that each image was generated on request.

Ten 5-second clips from the video generator at 20 credits each, image input with Bianca as the reference: Walking (Beach), Dancing (Studio), Playing with hair (City), Sporting (Rooftop), Sitting down (Living Room), Strip top, Naked, Wet shower (Bedroom), Touching breasts (Living Room), Spread legs teasing (Bedroom), each with camera, tempo, emotion and style pills. Every clip was downloaded.

Each clip was checked frame by frame: every one of the 150 frames measured for consecutive-frame similarity, motion and luma difference, temporal spikes flagged, start, middle and end compared, and ten regular frames plus the frames around spikes put on a contact sheet and inspected.

10 of 10 delivered, 830x1108 H.264 at 30 fps, 150 frames, 5.0 s, with a near-silent audio track. Generation took 50 s to 4.7 min, 2.6 min on average, longest for the explicit actions. Credits went from 359 to 159.

Motion is smooth (consecutive-frame similarity 0.96 to 0.99, no hard cuts) and the face stays the same woman within and across clips.

The recurring defect is object continuity: the ponytail turns into loose hair (Playing with hair), trainers appear on bare feet (Sporting), heels appear as she sits (Sitting down), a white bra appears under a top that had nothing beneath it (Strip top), and the shower clip paints water and soap as white stripes. Camera pills (Orbit, Slow Zoom) and Close-Up were ignored; 'Dancing' was a sway. The named action was performed in 9 of 10.

• 10-second clips and text-to-video from described appearance were not run.
• Frame inspection covered ten regular frames and the spike neighbourhoods per clip, not every frame.

Looked for a call mode on every character page, in the player's controls, in the custom character's Chat and Video links, in the page's permission requests and in the docs page 'How live AI video chat works'.

There is no voice call. 'Video chat with <Name>' scrolls to the same player; the user types, and the character answers in text read aloud while a pre-produced clip plays. The player's controls are Resume, Play, Details, Toggle sound, Reset chat, Choose AI model, Fullscreen, Loop action, Emoji and Send; there is no microphone button and the page never asks for microphone access. The character FAQ says the clips 'were produced in advance'.

The text-to-voice turn was timed instead: on the recorded Laura session the first sound arrived 0 to 16 seconds after Send, usually within a second of the text appearing.

• If a call feature is added, this category should be rerun with the standard fifteen-question calls.

The platform's four selectable voices each have a sample file ('Hi there, how are you?', 1.0 to 1.3 seconds of speech); the same voices are assigned to characters. All four were scored on the same naturalness, clarity, pacing and intonation criteria used for every platform: a naturalness score, pitch and its spread, the words heard, and the fixed rubric.

A 10-minute recording of Laura's spoken replies was also taken during her 29-message run.

Every sample transcribed word for word. Pitch spread of 5 to 6 semitones is lively. The naturalness score was 2.1 to 2.9 on these short compressed files. The rubric gave 4/5 on three voices and 3/5 on one.

The page mixes background noise and music into the same output as the voice, so the reply recording analysed as 26 segments of which only one transcribed even after normalisation. It confirms that replies are spoken but is not a usable quality measurement.

• The reply recording could not be used for quality because of the mixed-in music and ambience; separating the voice from that mix was not attempted.

Every character link on the home page under each filter (All, Human, Avatar, Anime, Trending, New), scrolled to the end, plus the /chats list and the anime and realistic landing pages, collected and de-duplicated.

21 distinct characters: Alana, Betty, Bianca, Brenda Dixon, Cassandra, Elena, Elise, Emilia, Goddess Venom, Lara Winters, Linden, Luna, Mina, Molly, Nahir Rouge, Nova, Priya, Rosa, Skylar Sweet, Veronica, Yuki. Filters: Human 6, Avatar 15, Anime 3, Trending 8, New 13. There is a search box. Custom characters are private to each account; the generator's 'Choose a girl' grid is reference photos, not chat characters.